Legal Opinion

Heinke v. Chipman Knitting Mills

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 14, 1927No. 3083Published

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, District Judge.

The plaintiff sues for infringement of his patent, No. 1,399,299, granted December 6, 1921, upon an application filed May 17, 1921, for a new method of knitting stockings having a seamless leg and heel and a full-fashioned foot. The defendant is and has been for! many years engaged in. the manufacture of stockings at Easton, Pa.

The answer denies infringement, sets up prior invention by patent No. 924,605, granted June 8, 1909, to Albert Gee, and public use and sale under the Gee patent for more than two years prior to Heinke’s application, 'and that the defendant has…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Stainless Steel Co. v. Ludlum Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  2. A. B. Dick Co. v. Underwood Typewriter, Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917
  3. Merrell-Soule Co. v. Powdered Milk Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API