Legal Opinion

Caldarola v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 23, 1946PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDesmond, J.

Plaintiff, a longshoreman, was injured while working on the deck of a steamship moored at a New York City pier, hy reason of the breaking of a cargo boom which was part of the ship’s gear and which, the jury held, was defective. Plaintiff was not a member of the ship’s crew but was an employee of an outside stevedoring contractor. The vessel was owned by the United States. Plaintiff sued defendants-respondents Eckert, alleging and attempting to prove that those defendants were so much in possession and control of the ship, at the time of the accident, as to make them responsible to third…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. S. R. A., Inc. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Brady v. Roosevelt Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Cullings v. GoetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Hust v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Caldarola v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Caldarola v. EckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Miller v. MuscarelleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. La Rocca v. FarringtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Muscelli v. Frederick Starr Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. Sound of Market Street, Inc. v. Continental Bank InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API