Legal Opinion

Eversman v. Concrete Cutting & Breaking

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 11, 1997No. Docket 183948PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals by leave granted from an order of the Worker’s Compensation Appellate Commission (wcac) denying worker’s compensation benefits and reversing a magistrate’s open award of benefits. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiff operated a special machine designed to cut and break concrete, and his job required him to travel to various work sites. In July 1990, plaintiff went on a multiday assignment that took him to several states, including a job site outside Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Plaintiff and his partner, Stanley Stewart, rented a motel room in a commercial area on a four-lane road…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whetro v. AwkermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Bush v. ParmenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Olinger Construction Co. v. MosbeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Epp v. Midwestern MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Claim of Robards v. New York Division Electric Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ramirez v. Dawson Production Partners, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Shelton v. Azar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  3. Eversman v. Concrete Cutting & BreakingMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Angel v. Jahm, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Bowman v. R L Coolsaet Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API