Conforto v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1DissentDyk, Circuit Judge
In my view, the majority’s jurisdictional holding is inconsistent with the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA), see 5 U.S.C. §§ 7702-03, and with the Supreme Court’s decision in Kloeckner v. Solis, 568 U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 596, 184 L.Ed.2d 433 (2012). The majority holds that this circuit has jurisdiction to review Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) decisions in mixed cases involving discrimination allegations even though, as the Supreme Court recently held, Congress specifically excluded those cases from our jurisdiction and required review in district courts. See 5 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. MuchnickSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Elgin v. Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Kloeckner v. SolisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Garcia v. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.