Legal Opinion

Reid v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 9, 1929No. 19452PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

The only question raised by the record in this case is whether or not. the trial judge erred in sustaining the general demurrer to the petition, which is in substance as follows:

“The petition of Harry Reid, by C. L. Reid- as next friend, shows to the court: 1. That the defendant herein named is the City of Atlanta, a municipal corporation, etc. 2. That the defendant has injured and damaged your petitioner in the sum of $5,000, by reason of the facts hereinafter set out. 3. That the defendant is the owner of an amusement park, located in Atlanta, State and county aforesaid, commonly known as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cornelisen v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  2. Roughton v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. National Bank v. EverettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  4. Cobb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  5. Jones v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Petty v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  2. Watkins v. City of ToccoaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Felton v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Roberts v. Mayor of SavannahCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  5. Tarver v. Savannah Beach, Tybee IslandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API