Legal Opinion

In re Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 6, 1936No. 18204PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELSH, District Judge.

This is a claim by the Union Traction Company against the Philadelphia Rapid Transit Company, hereinafter called P. R. T., for use and occupation under lease of the street railway system of Philadelphia, excluding the city-owned Broad Street Subway and Frankford Elevated. We referred the claim to a special master for consideration and recommendation, and he has recommended a payment of $3,500,000.

Exceptions to the special master’s recommendation have been filed by the P. R. T., by the trustees of the P. R. T., by the city of Philadelphia, and by the Public Service…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re SterbaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
  2. James v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1904
  3. Continental Bank & Trust Co. of New York v. Nineteenth & Walnut Streets Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935
  4. Montello Brick Co. v. TrexlerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
  5. In Re Nineteenth & Walnut Streets CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Victory Const. Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1981
  2. In re Charles Nelson Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API