Legal Opinion

Continental Bank & Trust Co. of New York v. Nineteenth & Walnut Streets Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 22, 1935No. 5763, 5764PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In this case it appears that on July 7, 1924, the Nineteenth & Walnut Street Corporation (hereafter called Nineteenth), the owner of the Rittenhouse-Plaza Apartment (hereafter called Plaza), gave a duly recorded mortgage to Walter S. Klee to secure a bond issue of $3,200,000. Subsequently this mortgage was duly assigned to the Continental Bank & Trust Company of New York (hereafter called Continental) and thereafter Nineteenth conveyed the premises, subject to said mortgage, to the Rittenhouse-Plaza Apartment Corporation (hereafter called Rittenhouse), the present…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Randal v. Jersey Mortgage Investment Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Tryon v. MunsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  3. In re TorchiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
  4. Bindseil v. Liberty Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
  5. In re Industrial Cold Storage & Ice Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1908

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Campe v. BillsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
  2. Reighard v. Higgins Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
  3. In re Charles Nelson Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1939
  4. In re H. K. Porter Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. In re Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API