Legal Opinion
Century Federal, Inc. v. City of Palo Alto, Cal.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 15, 1984No. C-83-4231 EFLPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LYNCH, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint. The plaintiff asserts antitrust and First Amendment claims as well as a state free expression claim and state law claims for interference with a right to use dedicated utility poles. Upon considering the briefs and argument of counsel, the Court hereby grants defendants’ motion to dismiss as to the antitrust claims and denies the motion as to the free expression and dedication claims. 1
I. FACTS 2
The plaintiff is an aspiring cable television (hereinafter “CTV”) operator.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Preferred Communications, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Preferred Communications, Inc. v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Century Federal, Inc. v. City of Palo Alto, Cal.District Court, N.D. California · 1986
- Catalina Cablevision Associates a Joint Venture v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Carlson v. Village of Union City, Mich.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.