Legal Opinion

Watson v. Hahn

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 15, 1872PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to District Court, Gilpin County.

1Opinion of the CourtHallett, C. J.

Assumpsit by second indorsee against first indorser of a promissory note, and demurrer to special counts in the declaration overruled; plea of general issue to the common counts, and trial to the court and judgment for the plaintiff.

Upon the question raised by the demurrer, the- supreme court held, under a Virginia statute in some respects similar to ours, that an indorsee of a promissory note could not sue *495a remote indorser at law (Mandeville v. Riddle, 1 Cranch, 290), and that the remedy was by bill in equity. Riddle v. Mandeville, 5 Cranch, 322. In Illinois, whence our statute was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Riddle & Co. v. Mandeville & JamessonSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  2. Mandeville v. Joseph Riddle & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Ballance v. LeonardIllinois Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Denver & New Orleans Construction Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API