Legal Opinion
Ohio v. Cox
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 4, 1919No. 163PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In Equity. Suit by the State of Ohio, on the relation of Albert G. Erkenbrecher,. against James M. Cox, as Governor of Ohio.
1Opinion of the Court
HOELISTER, District Judge.
Albert G. Erkenbrecher, a resident of Cincinnati and a citizen of Ohio, requested the Attorney General of Ohio to bring this suit, and, having been denied, files this bill against James M. Cox, as Governor of Ohio, a citizen of that state and a resident in the Western division of the Southern district. The suit is brought by complainant—
“as such citizen and as a taxpayer in said district and interested in public welfare * * * in his own behalf and in behalf of the citizens of the state of Ohio, and other citizens of the United States who may desire to join in the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Behre v. Anchor Ins.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- State ex rel. Byerley v. State Board of CanvassersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
- Kay Jewelry Co. v. Board of Registration in OptometryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
- Ex Parte GilmoreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920