Legal Opinion

Forcheimer & Co. v. Mayo

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa county.' There is a sufficient statement of the facts in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Yan Yalkenburgh

This- was an action of replevin, brought by Forcheimer & Co. against Mayo, to recover 222 pine saw logs. The cause was tried before a jury, and the verdict was for the defendant.

Plaintiffs moved for new trial, upon the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence and the law. This motion was denied, and judgment against the plaintiffs for costs was awarded. From this judgment the plaintiffs bring their appeal.

No exceptions to the rulings of the court on the trial, or ;to the charge to the jury were noted. It was a question of ■ fact as to which of the parties were owners of the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holland v. State ex rel. Duval CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1887
  2. Foster v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  3. Broward v. RocheSupreme Court of Florida · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API