Legal Opinion

Davis v. Parrish

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1998No. 23358PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is an independent action to set aside a quiet title judgment. We conclude that the action is not barred by res judicata, that it was brought within a reasonable time, but that the trial court correctly granted summary judgment dismissing the claim.

I

THE BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

Barbara Davis (Davis) and Carol Parrish (Parrish) are half sisters. In 1987, as co-personal representatives of their father’s estate, Davis and Parrish conveyed to themselves undivided one-half interests in two parcels of real property (the property) that their father had owned. In October…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Compton v. ComptonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Edgeller v. JohnstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Smith v. J.B. Parson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Hammitt v. Virginia Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Woll v. CostellaIdaho Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Camp v. East Fork Ditch Co., Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Meyers v. HansenIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Waller v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND WELFAREIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Bartosz v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Grube v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API