Legal Opinion

Amory v. Assessors of Boston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 27, 1941PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

When this petition for a writ of mandamus was before this court on a previous occasion we held that a demurrer to the petition should have been sustained solely on the ground that there was an adequate statutory remedy. Amory v. Assessors of Boston, 306 Mass. 354. The present bill of exceptions states that after the filing in the Superior Court of the rescript “Demurrer sustained” and after the ease had become ripe for judgment in that *163court, “judgment . . . was entered” on July 15, 1940, in these words, “Judgment for respondents.” Thereafter, on August 2, 1940, on motion by the petitioners,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. White v. GoveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  2. Karrick v. WetmoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Gallo v. FoleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. City of Boston v. SantosuossoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Marsch v. Southern New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lowell Bar Ass'n v. LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. In re KeenanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Farrar v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  4. Sullivan v. JordanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Higgins v. First National Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API