Legal Opinion
Preserve Our Islands v. Shorelines Hearings Board
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 19, 2006No. Nos. 55655-0-I; 55656-8-IPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 In these consolidated cases, Preserve Our Islands (POI) and King County (County) appeal the Shorelines Hearings Board’s (Board) order requiring the County to issue shoreline substantial development and conditional use permits to Glacier Northwest (Glacier) for its proposed barge-loading facility on Maury Island. The facility will allow Glacier to transport large quantities of sand and gravel off island from its adjacent upland mine. Appellants contend the facility is not water dependent, as required by the King County Shoreline Master Program (Master Program), because the mining operation…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. SellersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Preserve Our Islands v. Shorelines Hearings Bd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Department of Revenue v. Sprint Spectrum, LPCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- OLYMPIC TUG & BARGE v. Dept. of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Olympic Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Herman v. Shorelines Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.