Legal Opinion
Gilman v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided December 9, 1983No. 1:98-adr-00003PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DEVINE, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs allege various violations surrounding defendants’ dealings in securities. Defendants earlier moved to dismiss, and the Court found that the complaint was not adequate but granted leave to amend. Plaintiffs amended their complaint, and defendants again moved to dismiss.
On a motion to dismiss, the Court construes the material facts alleged in the complaint in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. DeRosa v. Chicago Title Insurance Company, 681 F.2d 66, 68 (1st Cir.1982). The facts in the complaint are taken as admitted, and dismissal shall be…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Manchester Manufacturing Acquisitions, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1992
- Seidel v. Public Service Co. of New HampshireDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1985
- Cooperativa Ahorro Y Credito Aguada v. Kidder, Peabody & Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1991
- Brabham v. Patenta N.V.District Court, D. Oregon · 1984
- Brabham v. PATENTA NVDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.