Legal Opinion
Brabham v. Patenta N.V.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided November 5, 1984No. Civ. No. 83-1248-REPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REDDEN, District Judge:
Defendants, Laventhol & Horwath and Harold A. First, move the court for an order dismissing Count II and portions of Count VI of plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Count II alleges a violation of § 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77q. The portions of Count VI defendants seek to have dismissed allege violations of Wash.Rev.Code §§ 21.20.020 and 21.20.030. Defendants also move the court for an order dismissing all claims asserted against defendants John Does. For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baker v. Eagle Aircraft Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1986
- Brabham v. PATENTA NVDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1984
- Peoples National Bank of Washington v. NicholsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1985