Legal Opinion

Omaha Grain Exchange v. Spillman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1929No. 26831PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This is an action to enjoin the attorney general of the state from enforcing the provisions of chapter 8, Laws 1927, upon the ground that said act and particularly sections 2 and 3 thereof are violative of both the federal and the state Constitutions. A general demurrer to the petition was sustained. Plaintiff elected to stand on its petition. Judgment of dismissal was entered. Plaintiff appeals.

In its petition plaintiff sets forth generally the nature of the business transacted by it and also' pleads certain of its rules and regulations relative to the buying, selling, inspecting and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex parte RandolphU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Virginia · 1833
  2. Morse v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Hoover v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Wabaska Electric Co. v. City of WymoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  5. School District No. 25 v. De LongNebraska Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Fargo v. SathreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Sickler v. City of Broken BowNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Golden v. BartholomewNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Banning v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Jensen v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API