Legal Opinion

State v. Sulman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 5, 1973PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

On a jury trial the defendant, a licensed physician, was found guilty of attempting to procure an abortion in violation of the provisions of § 53-29 of the General Statutes, and he has appealed from the judgment rendered on the verdict. A decision as to one of the defendant’s many assignments of error is dispositive of the merits of his appeal.

The crime of which the defendant was convicted was committed in March, 1969. At the commencement of his trial, during the trial and on this appeal, the defendant has asserted the unconstitutionality of the statute pursuant to the provisions of which he…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Janice Abele v. Arnold MarkleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  5. Byrn v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. OrsiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. State v. MenilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  3. State v. MenilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API