Massongill v. County of Scott
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Justice.
Appellant Doyle Massongill filed this illegal-taxation class-action suit against appellants Scott County Judge and the Scott County Quorum Court members (hereinafter the County), challenging the validity of two ordinances, 92-3 and 95-3, as amended by 96-3 (hereinafter 96-3). Ordinance 92-3 was enacted on January 13, 1992, and it provided for a solid-waste management program for the County and established a solid-waste collection and disposal fee for households and businesses located in the County. Ordinance 96-3 was enacted on January 3, 1996, and it provided Quorum Court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dreyfus v. BooneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Geurin v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- Beaumont v. FaubusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Earwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Foster v. GravesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Massongill v. County of ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Massongill v. County of ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1999
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1998
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.