Legal Opinion

Newell Bridge & Railway Co. v. East Liverpool Traction & Light Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error: Court of Appeals for Columbiana county.

1Opinion of the CourtMetcalfe, J.

The only questions in this case. before the court at this time are raised by the demurrer to the answer. The plaintiff operates á line of street railway from Newell, West Virginia, across the Ohio river to the city of East Liverpool, Ohio, and in the latter city runs its cars over a portion of the tracks of the deféndant company. The right to so operate its cars on the defendant’s tracks is secured by contract, and it is the duty of-the defendant to keep its tracks in repair.

On one of the streets in East Liverpool, over wvhich the plaintiff ran its cars, was a switch which was out of repair.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. FaxonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Le Vette v. Hardman EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Eugene C. Lewis Co. v. Metropolitan Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  4. Eugene C. Lewis Company v. . Metropolitan Realty CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Levin v. HabichtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dehn v. S. Brand Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Ohio Edison Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API