Legal Opinion

Baker v. Armstrong

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1877PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Erom the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, C. J.

Suit to foreclose a mortgage, and to Suit correct mistakes in the mortgage and in the note intended to be secured by it.

The suit was by James K. Armstrong, against Washington S. Baker, Nancy J. Davidson, David Davidson, Christopher S. Hiatt and Jacob Stroup.

Baker was the maker of the note and mortgage; Nancy J. Davidson was the payee and the grantor of the land intended to be embraced in it, to Baker. David Davidson was her husband. Hiatt was the grantee of Baker, and Stroup of Hiatt. Possession was taken by each of the purchasers upon the purchase.

Armstrong, the appellee, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stuyvesant v. Mayor of New-YorkNew York Court of Chancery · 1845
  2. Bennett v. PrestonIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Conwell v. CliffordIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Goodall v. MopleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Cox's Adm'r v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Teal v. SpanglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Stribling v. BrougherIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Barnum v. RallihanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Carson v. ButtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
  5. Sharpe v. DillmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API