Legal Opinion

Virginia Railway & Power Co. v. Hubbard

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 15, 1917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

•Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Norfolk county, in am action of trespass on the case. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.

The evidence in this case is sufficient to show that Mrs. Hubbard, while riding as a passenger on a car of the defendant company, was injured because a fellow passenger, Zimmer, who was standing in the aisle of the car stooping *666over talking to another passenger, when the car suddenly-started, fell upon her, his hand or fist striking her in the abdomen, from which blow she immediately suffered very great pain and inconvenience. Mrs. Hubbard for some years previous to that time had had a fibroid tumor in her womb, which she had been advised to have removed, but which had hot been done because,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Peshine v. SheppersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1867
  2. Virginia Railway & Power Co. v. McDemmickSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
  3. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. SpearsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  4. Norfolk Railway & Light Co. v. WilliarSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  5. Montgomery Traction Co. v. WhatleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Varley v. MotylSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  2. Watford v. MorseSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
  3. Safety Motor Transit Corp. v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  4. Champlin Refining Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  5. Elliott ex rel. Elliott v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API