Legal Opinion

Higginbotham v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1882PublishedCited by 16 opinions

"Writ of Error to thé Circuit Court for Marion county. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice VanValkenburgh

The defendant, Higginbotham, was indicted at the Spring Term of the Circuit Court held in and for Marion *558county, March, 1880, for “ assault with intent to murder,” under Sec. 37, Sub-Chap. 3, Chap. 1637, Laws 1868. He plead not guilty, was tried and convicted in Hovember, 1880. The counsel for the defendant then moved for a new trial, assigning twenty-seven grounds therefor. The court overruled the motion and sentenced the defendant to ten years hard labor in the penitentiary. From this judgment he brings his writ of error.

The errors assigned are principally to the admission and the refusal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hartung v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Keller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1858
  3. The Schooner Rachel v. The United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  4. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1876
  5. Wall v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1857

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. LowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. State v. WattsSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  3. Libby v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Ex parte PellsSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  5. State v. TownleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API