Legal Opinion

In re Disciplinary Action Against Crosby

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 7, 1998No. C6-97-2246PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WHEREAS, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Anthony D. Crosby has committed professional conduct warranting public discipline, namely engaging in and pleading guilty to theft by swindle; and

WHEREAS, respondent has waived his rights pursuant to Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR); has withdrawn his answer to the petition and unconditionally admits the allegations of the petition; and has entered into a stipulation with the Director in which they jointly recommend a…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Action Against BonnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. In re Disciplinary Action Against GlasserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Brian James ENGEL, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 299790Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Brian James ENGEL, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 299790Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  5. In re Reinstatement of CrosbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API