Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Edward Gardner Plumbing & Heating, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1984No. 19875PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals a ruling of the Industrial Commission denying his claim for workmen’s compensation benefits. The Commission affirmed the findings of fact, conclusions of law and order of the administrative law judge, which held that plaintiff suffered no permanent physical impairment attributable to the industrial injury. On appeal, plaintiff claims that the Commission arbitrarily ignored substantial, uncon-tradicted evidence of injury and that the administrative law judge improperly excluded evidence supporting plaintiff’s claim. We agree with plaintiff that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Utah Copper Co. v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Cavco Industries v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Schmidt v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Gordon v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. Dependents of Cazimero v. KOHALA SUGAR COMPANYHawaii Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bunnell v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF UTAHUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Thomas A. Paulsen Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Bunnell v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF UTAHUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Bunnell v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF UTAHUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Thomas A. Paulsen Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API