Legal Opinion
Milam v. Settle
West Virginia Supreme Court
Decided December 5, 1944No. CC 689PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Fox, Judge:
The plaintiff, Arthur Milam, seeking to recover from the defendants, Paul Settle and others, damages for an alleged conspiracy, and acts performed thereunder to his prejudice, instituted his action of trespass on the case, in the Circuit Court of Kanawha County. The summons in the action, returnable to August Rules, 1943, commands the Sheriff of said county to “summon Paul Settle, T. R. Pickett, Harry Settle, J. W. McCormick, Ernest King, Charlie Palmer, Tom Bonham, R. M. Hardiman, S.' R. Joyner, P. L. Peek, W. H. Ryan, George Carte, and others too numerous to mention, Members…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Simpson v. Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
- Operative Plasterers' & Cement Finishers' International Ass'n v. CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
- West v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
- City of Fairmont v. Retail, Wholesale, & Department Store UnionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- West Virginia Secondary School Activities Commission v. WagnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1958
- State Ex Rel. West Virginia State Lodge, Fraternal Order of Police v. City of CharlestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
- State Ex Rel. Glass Bottle Blowers Ass'n v. SilverWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.