Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Hallinan
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 16, 1998No. A081428PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WALKER, J.
The District Attorney for the City and County of San Francisco (District Attorney) appeals the trial court’s order granting Robert Holmes’s petition for a writ of mandate and ordering the District Attorney to reinstate Holmes after the District Attorney fired him for falsifying workers’ compensation forms and dishonesty. The trial court found that the District Attorney violated Holmes’s due process right to notice and an opportunity to be heard prior to his termination and his right to an administrative appeal under the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Codd v. VelgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Gilbert v. HomarSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Katzberg v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Gilbert v. City of SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Giuffre v. SparksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- MARVIN LIEBLEIN, INC. v. ShewryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- SHUER v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.