Legal Opinion

In re Champlain Parkway Wetland Conditional Use Determination (Fortieth Burlington, LLC)

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 9, 2018No. 2017-413PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEaton, J.

*955 ¶ 1. This appeal arises following the decision of the Agency of Natural Resources (ANR) extending the City of Burlington's 2011 Conditional Use Determination (2011 CUD), which permitted the City to commence construction on the Champlain Parkway project. Appellant Fortieth Burlington, LLC (Fortieth) contests ANR's approval of the permit extension, and the Environmental Division's subsequent affirmance of that decision, on the basis that the City failed to adhere to several project conditions outlined in the 2011 CUD and was required to redelineate and reevaluate the wetlands impacted by the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Levy v. Town of St. Albans Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  2. Birchwood Land Company, Inc. v. KrizanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  3. In Re Taft Corners Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  4. State v. TierneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  5. In re Application of Lathrop Limited Partnership I, II and IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Champlain Parkway SW Discharge Permit - Decision on Motion (Dismiss)Vermont Superior Court · 2019
  2. Champlain Parkway Wetland Determination - Decision on MotionsVermont Superior Court · 2019
  3. DeVita Subdivision Amendment - Decision on MeritsVermont Superior Court · 2019
  4. Hinesburg Hannaford SD - Decision on MotionVermont Superior Court · 2019
  5. In Re Costco Wholesale Administrative Decision (R.L. Vallee, Inc. & Timberlake Associates L.L.P., Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API