Legal Opinion
Div. of Pari-Mutuel Wagering v. Winfield
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 11, 1984No. 83-464PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
443 So.2d 455 (1984)
DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, Department of Business Regulation, Robert M. Smith, Jr. and Gary Rutledge, Appellants,
v.
Clifton WINFIELD, Nigel Winfield, Nikki Winfield, a Minor, by and through Her Father and Next Friend, Malcolm Winfield and Frank Marano, Appellees.
No. 83-464.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
January 11, 1984.
Elliot H. Henslovitz, Staff Atty., Miami, for appellants.
Robert M. Leen and Joseph L. Schneider of Leen & Schneider, Hollywood, for appellees.
LETTS, Judge.
At issue is the power of the Pari-Mutuel Wagering Division of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- FLORIDA PUBLIC SERV. v. Triple" A" EnterprisesSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Milohnich v. First National Bank of Miami SpringsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Taggart Corp. v. BenzingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Winfield v. Div. of Pari-Mutuel WageringSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Reno v. PelulloDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985