Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Few

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1809PublishedCited by 30 opinions

THIS was an action for a libel. The declaration contained two counts. The first count charged that the defendant “ did, on the 12th day of March, 1807, at, &c. wickedly and maliciously publish, and cause and procure to be published, in a certain common and public news-a ^ paper, called “ American Citizen, a ialse, scandalous, wicked, and malicious libel of and concerning the said Morgan Lezvis, governor as aforesaid, containing, among other things, the false, scandalous,…

Read the full summary

THIS was an action for a libel. The declaration contained two counts. The first count charged that the defendant “ did, on the 12th day of March, 1807, at, &c. wickedly and maliciously publish, and cause and procure to be published, in a certain common and public news-a ^ paper, called “ American Citizen, a ialse, scandalous, wicked, and malicious libel of and concerning the said Morgan Lezvis, governor as aforesaid, containing, among other things, the false, scandalous, wicked, malicious and libellous matter following, of and concerning the ° said Morgan Lewis, as governor of the said state,…

1Opinion of the Court 1

Kent, Ch. J.

We cannot compel the party to make an election, in this case. If it was a motion for a new trial, it might be otherwise. We must give our opinion on the demurrer to the evidence, if the defendant demands it, and chooses to bring on the argument.

*13You cannot declare according to the tenor and effect j but the precise words must be set forth.* In Boyce v. Whitaker,† Lord Mansfield said, that if the defendant had set out the statute unnecessarily in his pica, 'that ££ he would hold him to half a letter.”

In the case of King v. Marsack,‡ where in reciting a statute, or was put for and,…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Thompson.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Day v. WilberNew York Supreme Court · 1804

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. . EnoNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Root v. King & VerplanckNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  3. Dearing v. Bank of CharlestonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
  4. Jones v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  5. Hoey v. New York Times Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API