Legal Opinion

Jones v. Brown

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 16, 1880PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court of Cedar Rapids. The defendants N. B. Brown and William Harper, having certain differences, selected O. C. T. Jones, the plaintiff herein, one U. S. Taylor and JT. H. Camburn as arbitrators, to settle said differences, make an award and report the same for judgment thereon, to the Linn District Court.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Superior Court of Cedar Rapids. The defendants N. B. Brown and William Harper, having certain differences, selected O. C. T. Jones, the plaintiff herein, one U. S. Taylor and JT. H. Camburn as arbitrators, to settle said differences, make an award and report the same for judgment thereon, to the Linn District Court. The defendants Brown and Harper, as principals, and the other defendants as sureties, entered into a bond in the penal sum of $1,000, by which they bound themselves to pay to said arbitrators, as compensation for their services, the sum of ten dollars each per day, at…

1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.

i. aiÍbitracfaasácts.^" for. I. The demurrer having been overruled as to the answer in defense of the plaintiff’s action, and sustained as to the counter-claims, the questions presented are to be considered in the same light as though the defendant was plaintiff in an action seeking *77to recover damages of Jones, one of the arbitrators, for the alleged corrupt and fraudulent acts set forth in the counterclaims. It will be observed that the defendant first claims damages for the alleged corrupt acts and practices of which the plaintiff was guilty during the hearing before the arbitrators, and up…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. French v. GiffordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  2. Lewis v. FewNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  3. Wasson v. MitchellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  4. Gowing v. GowgillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Lundgren v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Coopers & Lybrand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Henke v. McCordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  4. Feichtinger v. ConantAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Hoosac Tunnel Dock & Elevator Co. v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API