Legal Opinion

Gamble v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 30, 1910PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Taylor County. Tried below before Hon. Thos. L. Blanton.

1Opinion of the Court

DUHKLIF, Associate Justice.

In this suit E. C. Gamble sought to recover of George B. Martin and King County four leagues of land situated in Lamb County. The history of the title to the land, according to the allegations in the plaintiff’s petition, was as follows: The land was patented to King County and, by mesne conveyances from the patentee, title to the land is vested in the defendant Martin, subject to the rights of plaintiff Gamble under and by virtue of the following facts substantially set forth in the petition. Prior to the purchase of the land by Martin, Ashby S. James owned it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bauserman v. BluntSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Palmer v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Williams v. BerginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. McDonald v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Connoly v. HammondTexas Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tarrant Savings Association v. Lucky Homes, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Federal Crude Oil Co. v. Yount-Lee Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Reyes v. Kingman Texas Implement Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Smith v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  5. Estate of Shinoe v. ShinoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API