Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State ex rel. Minehan v. Thompson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1912Published

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the District Court for McLean County, Crawford, J., in a proceeding to determine the result of an election on the division of McLean county.

1ConcurrenceBruce, J.

I concur in tbe result of tbe opinion filed by Mr. Justice Goss. I do not, however, wish to be understood as concurring in, or expressing an opinion upon, all of the propositions discussed either in the majority or dissenting opinions in this case. Much depends upon the conclusions that are to be derived from the former cases of State ex rel. Minehan v. Meyers, 19 N. D. 804, 124 N. W. 701; State ex rel. Miller v. Miller, 21 N. D. 324, 131 N. W. 282; State ex rel. Sunderall v. McKenzie, 10 N. D. 132, 86 N. W. 231; State ex rel. Davis v. Willis, 19 N. D. 209, 124 N. W. 706, and State ex rel.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McCue v. BlaisdellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  2. People v. Town of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. State ex rel. Davis v. WillisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Stebbins v. Judge of Superior CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. State ex rel. Peacock v. Village Council of OsakisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API