Legal Opinion
Wenzer v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 25, 1979No. Civ. A. 78-1264PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BECHTLE, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are the motions of defendants Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) and R. T. Fox (“Fox”) to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), and to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For the reasons stated below, the motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter will be granted as to Counts I and II of the amended complaint and the motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Moose Lodge No. 107 v. IrvisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Switchmen's Union v. National Mediation BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Joel Myron v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- G. & T. Terminal Packaging Co., Inc. And Anthony Spinale v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Fischer v. DriscollDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Marcucci v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.