Legal Opinion
Mobile Consortium of Ceta, Alabama v. United States Department of Labor
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided November 5, 1984No. 83-7469PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GEORGE C. YOUNG, District Judge:
Petitioner, Mobile Consortium of CETA 1 (“Consortium”), a prime sponsor under the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (“CETA”) of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 801 et seq., seeks review of a final order of the Secretary of Labor requiring the Consortium to repay $393,674.16 in misspent CETA grant funds. The order stems from a labor department audit of expenditures by the Consortium covering the period of June 3, 1974 through September 30, 1975. Based on the auditors’ findings, the department’s grant officer disallowed expenditures in the amount of $587,933.34. That…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bell v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- The School Board of Broward County, Florida v. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, United States Office of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- State of Maine, Office of Maine Ceta v. The United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Atlantic County, New Jersey v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Maryland Department of Human Resources v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- St. Regis Mohawk Tribe, New York v. William E. Brock, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Brands v. Sheldon Community SchoolDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1987
- Onslow County, North Carolina v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- City of Gary, Indiana v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986