Legal Opinion

Osbon v. Hartfiel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 3, 1937No. 31,472PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment. This suit was brought by her under the provisions of 2 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 9405, the purpose sought being to set aside a judgment and decree of divorce theretofore rendered in a suit brought by her husband and decided in his favor. Shortly after the entry of the divorce decree and before the commencement of this suit, the husband died, leaving an estate said to be of the value of about $60,000. Her suit ivas brought against the executor, the beneficiaries under the will, and the heirs at laAV.

The basis for plaintiff’s claim as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Quock Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. O'Leary v. WangensteenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Olsson v. Midland InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Hawkins v. SaubySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  5. Burud v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roske v. IlykanyicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Aaron v. StrausserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Calich v. Consul of the KingdomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. State v. EngstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API