Legal Opinion

Maynard v. Eaton Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2007No. 2007-1069PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Marion App. No. 9-06-33, 2007-Ohio-1906. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals Journal Entry filed June 7, 2007:

“Does the amendment to R.C. 1343.03, effective June 2, 2004, adjust the 10% rate of post-judgment interest calculated on a final judgment that was entered prior to the date of the amendment, but not paid in full and pending on appeal?”

2DissentLanzinger, J.

The conflict cases are Hausser & Taylor, LLP v. Accelerated Sys. Integration, Inc., Cuyahoga App. No. 86547, 2006-Ohio-1582,…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Hilliard v. First Industrial, L.P.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Maynard v. Eaton Corp., 9-06-33 (4-23-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Maynard v. Eaton Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API