Legal Opinion

Maynard v. Eaton Corp., 9-06-33 (4-23-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 2007No. 9-06-33PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-Appellant Leonard Maynard ("Maynard") appeals from the June 8, 2006 Judgment Entry of the Court of Common Pleas, Marion County, Ohio overruling his motion for pre-judgment interest, motion for attorney fees, and motion to be reimbursed for expenses.

{¶ 2} This matter stems from an incident that occurred on December 12, 1997 at an Eaton Corporation ("Eaton") facility in Marion, Ohio where Maynard was employed as a maintenance supervisor. While working third shift, Maynard was informed that there was smoke in the facility's north substation. He proceeded to the substation…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Zoppo v. Homestead InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Bittner v. Tri-County Toyota, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Galmish v. CicchiniOhio Supreme Court · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maynard v. Eaton Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Lynch v. Studebaker, 88117 (8-9-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Maynard v. Eaton Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API