River Oaks Motor Homes, Inc. v. Winnebago Industries, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
NOEL, District Judge.
This cause comes on the motion of defendant Winnebago Industries, Inc. (hereinafter Winnebago) to dismiss Count 3 of the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). Winnebago contends it is not an “automobile manufacturer” as defined in 15 U.S.C. § 1221(a) and therefore cannot be sued under the Automobile Dealers’ Day in Court Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1221-1225 (hereinafter the Act).
Plaintiff, River Oaks Motor Homes, Inc. (hereinafter River Oaks), filed its complaint following Winnebago’s termination of River Oaks as an authorized…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- Frank Motor Homes, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1964
- Frank Motor Homes, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- United States v. IrickDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1974
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lambert v. OgdenMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
- Birmingham Small Arms Co. v. Brooklyn Cycle, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1976