Legal Opinion
Birmingham Small Arms Co. v. Brooklyn Cycle, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 4, 1976No. 73 Civ. 730 and 74 Civ. 752PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PLATT, District Judge.
Triumph Norton Incorporated (formerly known as The Birmingham Small Arms Company, Incorporated) (“Triumph”) moves for an order, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, granting summary judgment in its favor upon all claims and counterclaims asserted in the above entitled actions on the grounds that there is no issue as to any material fact and that Triumph is entitled to summary judgment in its favor as a matter of law.
Facts
The attorneys for the parties filed a statement and counter-statement of ma terial facts pursuant to General…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hinkle Iron Co. v. . KohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Independence Discount Corp. v. BressnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Armour & Co. v. CelicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nelson v. Stanley Blacker, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Two Wheel Corp. v. American Honda Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1980
- Feldman Co. v. Atwood Richards, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996