Legal Opinion
Wiselman v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided October 27, 1993No. 91-1094-Civ-J-20PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
SCHLESINGER, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 106, filed September 24, 1993). Plaintiffs filed a response in opposition on October 19, 1993 (Doc. No. 128). Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File Oversized Reply Memorandum (Doc. No. 133, filed October 25, 1993) is GRANTED, and the Clerk shall docket that pleading prior to this Order.
Previously, Oppenheimer moved to dismiss the instant RICO count for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The Court denied that Motion, largely because it could not derive…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Bill Clark Herbert Futch Austin Hurst Louis Sliker and William Barrineau v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bailey v. TRENAM SIMMONS, KEMKER, SCHARF, BARKINDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1996
- Sikes v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1998
- Harper v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1999
- Harper v. AMERICAN TEL. AND TEL. CO.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1999