Fulton v. Fulton

Hirt, J.,

Opinion by

The master found the testimony sufficient to support the charge of adultery by clear and satisfactory proof and recommended a decree of divorce. The court, however, sustained the respondent’s exceptions to the master’s report and dismissed the libel. We find ourselves in accord with the master’s conclusions as to the credibility of libellant’s witnesses — the controlling issue— and the decree will be reversed.

The parties were married in 1921; because of the nature of the husband’s employment they moved from place to place on eight occasions, in five different states within…