Legal Opinion
Polimino v. Peters (In Re Polimino)
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 12, 2006No. BAP No. CO-06-002, Bankruptcy No. 05-25383-MERPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORNISH, Bankruptcy Judge.
Debtors/Appellants Daniel D. Polimino and Jennifer Polimino, (“Debtors”), appeal a judgment entered by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado in favor of the Chapter 7 Trustee, M. Stephen Peters, (“Trustee”), denying Debtors’ claimed exemption in proceeds from the refinancing of their home mortgage. Debtors claim that the proceeds from the refinancing are exempt from execution or attachment for one year after the refinancing pursuant to Colo.Rev.Stat. § 38-41-207 (2000) and that the bankruptcy court erred when it refused to allow them…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re Robert J. Young and Donna M. Young, Debtors. Fowler Brothers v. Robert J. Young and Donna M. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Barnett v. KnightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
- Department of Transportation v. StapletonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re ForeacreUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2006
- In re HamiltonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- In re MartinezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- In re: Lana Kay PaggenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2025
- Rebecca E WolfeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Washington · 2023