Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham Yardley

My brothers have stated the facts so fully that I shall not add anything except *374enough to make plain my reasoning. In the action against the corporation — Lee v. Jenkins Brothers (incorporated in New Jersey) — I need discuss only two questions: First, whether plaintiff’s testimony, which constituted all the evidence in the record, was so inherently improbable that it would have been necessary to set aside a verdict in his favor; and second, whether, assuming that Yardley did make the contract on behalf of the corporation, he had authority to do so. The result in the action against Yardley…