Legal Opinion

Papillon Airways, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 5, 2012No. 09-297TPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BASKIR, Judge.

Plaintiff, Papillon Arways (Papillon), seeks a refund of $900 it paid in Federal Ar Transportation Excise Tax pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 4261, and to abate the remaining $7,741,569 the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) asserts it owes. It claims exemption from the excise tax as an air taxi under 26 U.S.C. § 4281.

Pursuant to the statute, Papillon is ineligible for the exemption if the carrier operated on an “established line” during the disputed period. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of *156the Rules of the United States Court of Federal…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Sig and Barbara Shore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  5. Cincom Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gonzales Ex Rel. Gonzales v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API