Papillon Airways, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASKIR, Judge.
Plaintiff, Papillon Arways (Papillon), seeks a refund of $900 it paid in Federal Ar Transportation Excise Tax pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 4261, and to abate the remaining $7,741,569 the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) asserts it owes. It claims exemption from the excise tax as an air taxi under 26 U.S.C. § 4281.
Pursuant to the statute, Papillon is ineligible for the exemption if the carrier operated on an “established line” during the disputed period. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of *156the Rules of the United States Court of Federal…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Sig and Barbara Shore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Cincom Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gonzales Ex Rel. Gonzales v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014