Legal Opinion

State v. Ennis

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1983No. Crim. 885, and 895 to 898PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

Defendant/Appellant, Edward G. Ennis, was charged with and ultimately adjudged guilty in a bench trial of five separate offenses: possessing a controlled substance, five pounds of marijuana, with the intent to deliver, § 19-03.1-23(l)(b), N.D.C.C., § 19-03.1-05(4)(o), N.D.C.C.; unlawfully delivering a controlled substance, hashish, to Kevin Ostberg on September 23 and 28, 1981, § 19-03.1-23(l)(b), N.D.C.C., § 19-03.1-05(4)(i), N.D.C.C.; unlawfully delivering a controlled substance, marijuana, to René Ostberg on September 2, 1981, § 19-03.1-23(l)(b), N.D.C.C., §…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Seeley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. RingquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. EnnisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. RangeloffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API