Legal Opinion

Misik v. D'Arco CA2/3

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 6, 2014No. B242398Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 6/6/14 Misik v. D’Arco CA2/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THOMAS MISIK, B242398 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. GC041193) v. THOMAS R. D’ARCO, Defendant and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Mycogen Corp. v. Monsanto Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Mesler v. Bragg Management Co.California Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Dillard v. McKnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API