Ribhi Othman and Yusif H. Mashni, Individually, and Doing Business as E-Z Market, a Partnership v. Globe Indemnity Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs Othman and Mashni (Othman) appeal an adverse directed verdict on their causes of action against Globe Indemnity Co. (Globe) for bad faith denial of insurance coverage, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and punitive damages, all resulting from Globe’s denial of a claim under a fire insurance policy. 1 Because the complaint names “Doe” defendants, we raise sua sponte the issue of whether diversity jurisdiction exists. 2
Although the district court initially should not have allowed removal, we find that it had jurisdiction over the case at the time…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Mitchell v. MaurerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Samuel "Wesley" McCabe and John Elson v. General Foods Corporation, Alan Moltz, Abner Ladson and Does 1-100Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Marilyn Miller v. Rykoff-Sexton, Inc., and Atlas Hotels, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Solomon Lew v. Stanton Moss and Harlean MossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleischer v. Michael Baden and Sidney WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- John M. Dimidowich, Dba Micro Image v. Bell & HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.