Legal Opinion · Dissent

Breternitz v. City of Arvada

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 15, 1971No. 24977Published

1DissentJustice Groves

I respectfully dissent from the portion of the majority opinion contained in Article II thereof.

As stated in the majority opinion, 1965 Perm. Supp., C.R.S. 1963, 139-21-6(1) (d) (iv) provides among other things that the petition shall contain “ [a] n allegation that the signers of the petition comprise the landowners of more than fifty percent of the territory included in the area proposed to be annexed, exclusive of streets and *69alleys.” Section 6(2), providing for an annexation election provides as follows:

“ (d) (i) The petition for annexation election shall comply with the provisions of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kirschwing v. O'DonnellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  2. City of Montrose v. NilesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  3. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  4. Isaak v. PerrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  5. Crayton v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API