Legal Opinion

United States v. Thieman

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 20, 1963No. 17,181PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

2Per curiam

On his plea of guilty, the accused was convicted of unauthorized absence and wrongful appropriation of a motor vehicle, in violation of Articles 86 and 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 886, 921, respectively. His sentence, which was reduced on review, includes a bad-conduct discharge. At the time of the offenses, the accused *327was seventeen years of age. We granted further review of his conviction to consider the applicability of the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act, 18 USC § 5031, to courts-martial practice. For the reasons set out in United States v Baker,…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. WestU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
  2. Juvenile CausesConstitutional Law – Federal Enclaves – WhetherState Authorities Have Jurisdiction Over JuvenileOffenses On Aberdeen Proving Ground., Maryland Attorney General Reports2018
  3. Maryland Attorney General Opinion 103OAG49, Maryland Attorney General Reports2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API